|
Lessons learnt on Micro-Finance
Financial services
should not been given by non-financial projects or organisations
-
Credits by
non-financial projects or organisations (e.g. BDS providers) will cause a
conflict between business advisory and credit control.
-
Moreover,
non-financial organisations do not have the necessary instruments to
assure the regular credit repayment.
-
Financial services of
non financial organisations with non-commercial credit conditions can
undermine the efforts of the young national micro-finance system.
-
If non-financial organisations have enough
financial resources, they may rather support micro-finance institutions by
allocation of credit guarantee lines, in order to anable them to give
services for specific target groups.
Micro-credits are
more cost intensive
Micro-credits have higher adminstration costs as big loans of commercial
banks. So interest
rates of micro-finance are normally higher in order to cover the
administration costs.
Credit application
should depend on a good market position or potential of the business
Businesses which do not have a good
market position or potential, normally cannot use the credit in a profitable
manner, with the exception of credit determined to market activities.
Credit application
should be prepared by a detailed project or business plan
Financial support
should be prepared by non-financial assistance in order to analysis the
feasability of the project.
The purpose of the credit should
be specified in the credit contract
A detailed credit contract should
avoid the alienation of the credit purpose.
The follow-up of the business
should be assured
The follow-up should help the
business to avoid mismanagement, assure the effective use of the credit
and the regular repayment.
back
to lessons
|